“Readers are made, not born” (Chen)
In the British Literature class, we have been studying many authors and their works, and also one approach to working with literature: the Reader-Response. As I study English pedagogy, one of my main objectives is to incorporate literature in the class. I am very interested in working with literature in the EFL classroom and transmit my passion for literature to my students. The above quote can be explained as the need of introducing literature to students so that they can become good readers. Therefore, giving reading assignments is not enough, so we have to work and deal with literature in the class and help our students grow interested in reading. Consequently, the Reader-Response approach is essential and the most appropriate when my goal is to make readers. In this essay, I will use “The Virgin and the Gypsy” by D.H. Lawrence. I will briefly explain what the reader response is and what the short story’s main plot is. Afterwards, with this piece of art, I will provide various activities that can be used in the EFL classroom.
The Reader-Response approach is the most appealing to me because people get to bring themselves into their own readings. Readers’ experiences play a fundamental role in interpreting and understanding any piece of literature. This approach can be defined as the approach which emphasizes the individual as a reader—responder, the role of the reader as a re-creator who with his/her experience, previous readings, thoughts and feelings enrich any text. Also, the reader interacts with the text mainly because of the objectives of this approach such as encouraging individual readers to feel comfortable with their responses to a literary text, encouraging them to understand themselves better by giving arguments to their responses which will make them be aware of themselves (Chen).
“The Virgin and the Gypsy” is by definition a short story which makes it more accessible for high school students because it contains only one main plot and the language is easy to understand. The main plot of the story is the connection between the girl, Yvette, and the gypsy and the circumstances under which they met. We can also see that she and her sister had problems in her house especially with her aunt Cissie because they could not understand how this lady interfered with everything in the house. They also had to deal with the absence of their mother who left with a younger man. This story is a very accessible one because it is simple and easy to read. We need to consider our students’ proficiency level so that they do not feel overwhelmed by a piece of literature that is too complex for them.
By using the Reader-Response, we are compelled to include the student centered classroom. Most of the activities that I will briefly present need to be developed through group work and the teacher plays the role of a monitor and a guide in the class. This story can be used in the EFL classroom quite easily. We could be using this story for various classes and with many different activities. At the beginning they can build mind maps with characters’ relationships; that will make reading more understandable (Buehl, 2000). That would be the very first glance to the story. This process is completely necessary so that students do not get confused with the story or the characters.
Later on, we can focus on the story by asking different types of questions such as: factual or memory questions, interpretation questions, application questions and evaluation questions (Chen). So that understanding is clearer we should begin by asking factual or memory questions in order to make sure they do know the story and can later on provide an opinion with strong arguments about certain issues by including information and examples from the text. According to what I want to accomplish, the most suitable questions to be used would be application questions because students will draw on their own experiences because they will be relating the story to their personal lives. Their personal responses are essential for answering these questions.
Another activity in order to include this short story into the classroom is by asking our students to role-play different scenes or parts of the text (Chen). This is always fun and challenging for the students because they like to participate in the class. Through this activity, they will be able to show their own interpretations and maybe provide a twist to the plot. They should have as most liberty as possible and be able to disagree with what the writer decided to write in the story.
With “The Virgin and the Gypsy”, students can be asked to write several response journals to different questions so that they can prepare themselves for a conversation class because “selected readings have great potential for stimulating conversation, because once students are exposed to a given reading, they have a new fund of information that can be used as a departure point for discussion” (Dobson, 2005). The idea is that I decide on a few topics that are interesting and accessible from the reading so that students, after being assigned and prepared one topic, can participate in a discussion in groups where they can discuss the different topics presented in the story. 
The last activity I proposed for including this story in class is creating their own stories (Chen). They can be about the story itself, for example a different ending or something related to relationships between gypsies and people from other races. This would be a long process and I would include many revisions and editing. They can read each others’ stories and make comments and adjustments on how to improve the plot or the writing. The most remarkable characteristic of writing their own stories is that it makes the writing exercise more meaningful for students (Chen) since they will have freedom for writing and creating whatever that appeals to them. 
As a conclusion, I can say that we should always try to find time to include literature in the class. The stories we can access can be of any kind as long as they are adequate for our students’ skills in the language. As you can see, the activities are quite varied and easy to develop because you only need to engage your students with the different processes. By using the Reader-Response approach students will be encouraged to provide their opinions about what they read and the process will not be as that of reading for a comprehension test. They will be reading for learning, for getting to know themselves better and for growing.
Bibliography
Buehl, Doug. Classroom Strategies for Interactive Learning. 
Chen, Chi-Fen Emily. Teaching Literature to Children. <http://www2.nkfust.edu.tw/~emchen/CLit/Teaching.htm>.
Dobson, Julia. Effective Techniques for English Conversation Groups. 

  




Jane Austen lived in a time where women could be nothing but daughters and housewives. She was a writer in a time where nothing could be expected out of a woman. However, she wrote 6 of the most beautiful novels in English although she had no money and no room. She is world-wide recognized and dearly loved. Woolf states in many parts of her essay that Jane Austen proved the world, and men, that women could perfectly write as good as men. In some extent, Woolf compares Austen to Mozart in the following quote: “For while Jane Austen breaks from melody to melody as Mozart from song to song...” Therefore her genius is as Mozart’s or Shakespeare’s, to whom she also compares Jane Austen. 
One of the big issues of the time was the amount of population and overcrowding which was very well depicted in the movie "Oliver Twist" . We could see how so many people were at the markets and streets. Parks were also full, and over 10 people inhabited a house. What is more shocking was to see so many children alone in the streets. My question is: were they orphans just as Oliver? In the movie, we could see all the children that lived with Fagin and “worked” for him stealing. That sounds familiar. How many kids do we see “working” for other older people in the streets of Santiago? Or how many children are used as hooks for people to give them money?
All these issues depicted in “Oliver Twist” are present until today, and we can see them by just taking a Transantiago bus, subway or by going to Ahumada Street. It is almost incredible to believe that after over 150 years we still have the same problems in society. 
I must admit I still cannot understand what “The Signal-Man” is about. Anyhow, I could relate some of its key words while discussing it in the class. 
I would relate the character of the ghost and the premonition with the Grimm in Harry Potter since it has the same effect. Seeing the Grimm was a premonitory sign of your death. As we have discussed all writers include references to previous works of others. We can see that in almost every literary work. Anyway, I really liked the story because it was continually playing with our own fears, and it kept the mystery until the very end. 
Frankenstein was “born” and was abandoned by its own creator. This abandonment caused him to feel rejected although he continued trying to find good people that could accept him. He found a small family in a cottage and during a long period of time they were his family. But, when he encouraged himself to go see them, he encountered rejection again. His need of being in society made him seek for people who could accept him. However, this need of being accepted and in the company of other people disappeared after being rejected by several people again and again. He also found that he had no roots, he came from no place, and he had no name: he was not as the rest of the people. He began thinking that he should make his creator pay for what he suffered. Rejection made him be revengeful and this is shown in our society. Children who have suffered a great deal of problems and abandonment show themselves to be, in the worst of cases, criminals.
 I think Frankenstein is a story that leaves so much room for discussion. It definitely provides food for thought since you can easily identify problems that are present in the story which still happen nowadays. It would be great to bring Frankenstein to the classroom and discuss many of the issues depicted in the plot such as: identity, self-esteem, marginalization, family and regret.

I have this restlessness desire to know what happens after death. Where do we go to? Is there any place to go? Why have I taken all the trouble to live my life and do my best doing it if I will day and that's it, it will be over? This thought really worries me, and when I am thinking about it I feel so cold and my stomach gets tense. I mean, Death frightens me. And it makes me feel scared of wasting my time in silly things. I really think we have to live our life and take the most of it without wasting any minute.




 

Bringing literature to the classroom and everyday classes is of the utmost importance in order to create a more interactive environment based on the readings. It can also help students build and increase their vocabulary and command of English, as they will be constantly reading in and outside the classroom. Different techniques as the ones shown above can help us include, little by little, literary work in our teaching. Fortunately, there are several books on how to bring literature to the classroom such as: Teaching Reading with Literature by Gail Tompkins and Lea McGee, Read it Aloud by Judy Richardson, Reading Interaction (International Reading Association) and Classroom Strategies for Interactive Learning by Doug Buehl. In this essay, I have briefly shown its relevance and, to some extent, how to do it.


In Venice, Jews were being extremely discriminated against. Shylock was a usurer Jew and incredibly offended by Antonio a Christian. Being Bassanio’s friend, Antonio had to put his Christian pride aside and ask Shylock for money so that Bassanio could go to Belmont and have an opportunity with fair Portia who was a beautiful heiress. She could not choose his husband because his father stated in his will that Portia should marry the man who chose the right casket among the gold, the silver and the lead ones. Shylock lent Antonio 3000 ducats for three months without interest and the bond was that if in the 3 months Antonio did not pay the money, the Jew would take a pound of Antonio’s flesh. Jessica, the usurer’s daughter, was in love with a Christian and she eloped with him, in the ship with Bassanio, taking some of Shylock’s money and leaving him hateful.
While Bassanio succeeded choosing the right casket, Antonio’s time has come. Losing his ships at sea, he did not have the money so as to pay Shylock; therefore Shylock asked for a trial in which he would be able to take Antonio’s pound of flesh. After hearing what happened, Bassanio told his future wife how great his friend was and what he did for him. Portia gave Bassanio 6000 ducats to save his beloved friend and asked him to marry before leaving. After his departure, Portia left to his uncle’s house where she asked for advice to defend Antonio. At the end, Bassanio asked Shylock to accept 6000 ducats but his revengeful spirit did not allow that. Antonio was judged by Portia dressed as a young lawyer and sentenced to pay his bound. When Shylock was about to cut Antonio’s chest, wise Portia stated that he could take nothing but an exact pound of flesh without any drop of blood. Shylock lost all his possessions except his religion even though Antonio demanded Shylock to become Christian his Jewish faith was greater than anything else. 
What must be pointed out about this film is the high quality cast. Actors Al Pacino, Jeremy Irons, Joseph Fiennes and actress Lynn Collins were able to depict and perfectly portray Shakespeare’s characters. Al Pacino performed Shylock outstandingly and his speech will certainly be remembered. Lynn Collins introduced a very strong and intelligent Portia, and also made her quite witty. Irons highlighted Antonio’s pride and Fiennes depicted Bassanio’s passion. As a whole, the cast was extraordinarily well chosen. Through their performances we were able to feel what the characters felt in every minute of the movie. 
The movie, as well as the actual play, gives you plenty of things to think and discuss about. The repeated questions Is it a tragedy or comedy? Who wins at the end? Certainly do not have a finite answer as they might be seen from various perspectives. Therefore, the movie is good in the sense that does not give you those answers. 
Portia’s character; however, was, in my opinion, underappreciated in both the movie and the play. If we think about it, it was her who using her wit and intelligence could save Antonio’s life. Bassanio was not able to do anything and probably, without Portia’s existence, would have seen his most beloved and dearest friend die. 
Although I would like to encourage everybody to read books and Shakespeare’s plays, masterpieces like this movie make me agree that if you lack time you can watch a movie instead of reading. The merchant of Venice by director Michael Radford is 100% recommendable.




